Good day Anonymous.
As we are doing a good job thus-far in our war against the cult of pseudo-Scientology, we must be cautious of those who are currently standing against us. A wise man have once said that, in a state of battle, keep your friends and allies close but keep your enemies closer. I can not agree more. Since Anonymous is a proudly large collective entity with no leaders, it's important that we must remain focused and organized in terms of our strategic plannings and movements. We definitely don't wish for one man's mistakes to undermine, regress or completely fuck up what we've accomplished up to this point.
So today I will be discussing about just some of our oppositions that I've observed in these past few weeks - and what is scary is that some of them exists as disguises within our group. These people are no doubt either spies, undercovers or traitors that are attempting to destroy our organization from within. Here are some obvious members I have been studying on Youtube.
1. ANONYMOUSagainstAnon.
This is obviously a failed attempt from a secret Scifag, that tries to pose himself as Anonymous and use our code of dialects in order to fool us that he is a part of our body. This way, he can try to alter our route and ideas because he believes a fake "Anonymous" would be more impressionable on other anons. This is obviously nothing more than an epic fail. We can obviously see that this is a secret Scifag in disguise, and frankly, it seems to me like he has nothing more to do nowadays but to spam "BIGOTRY" all over our videos. Whenever you see this being done, simply spam him back with "HYPOCRISY" and move on.
Beware of him subscribing to your videos, he has nothing better to do on his spare time but to study our propaganda footages. He may very well be reporting everything back to his Scifag headquarter.
Although this one idiot does little to stunt our project's development itself, it demonstrates a very obvious flaw we have. Since our organization lacks a bureaucratic system, it has no security to it. Any motherfucking Scifag can easily infilitrate within, and pose as other Anons. They can try to steer us in a different direction, or they can try to corrupt us from the inside. Now I am not suggesting that we should establish bureaucracy and manually approve every member, since our anonymity is also one of our greatest strengths, but please be cautious of who you speak to, who you associate with online and trusting those who you don't know. A great philosopher have once said, TEH INTRAN3T IZ S0ME S3RI0UZ BUSYN3SZ.
I will now move on and discuss other threats.
2. defendscientology.
Unlike the first one, this one doesn't pose as an Anonymous from inside the group. Instead, he makes it very obvious that he supports Scientology by posting retarded fucking videos with the average IQ of everyone in Clearwater, Florida combined: 58. He tries to adopt to the style of other anon's video making, but however he fails at one particular thing, and that is being funny. What he also fails to realize is that being one among few vigilantes defending Scientology on Youtube, his incoherent bullshit quabble isn't going to get through to a mainstream audience. If anything, it will make his religious institution look like a bunch of fucking ass clowns. Yes, more so than they already do.
His full name is - apparently - Jacob K. Reist, so do a directory search of him in every state and see what you can come up with.
Now I will go on to discuss about something very suspicious I have received in my inbox yesterday.
3. Pause the video right now and read this message for a second.
No doubt some of you may have also received this as well. Although this may be just a genuine attempt of an outsider trying to document our ideology and agenda, it's strange that anyone would approach us in this fashion. Perhaps the group he hopes to gather up will in fact be working to disclose much-needed information for the scientology department? Why would Anonymous be spreading DVDs on the streets when the internet is proven to be the most effective medium for our spread of words? Again, this may not be as big of a deal as I am making it, but the point of this once again goes back to being careful of who you trust and who you work with. If his proposed project is to work, I am not sure how it may be organized seeing that our members are so scattered all over. This topic is open for discussion in the comment section of this page.
Now I will proceed to talk about the warnings of March 15th, 2008.
There has been and will be Scifags going undercover in masks, trying to pose as us at these raids. Be careful of who you associate and exchange information with, I cannot stress this enough. There have been people coming in and out of the Scientology headquarter in my city during the last protest and they circulate the perimeter, taking pictures of others while posing as reporters. Be careful of any "independent journalists" you speak to, be sure to ask them who they work for. Of course, a well rehearsed Scifag would have all the information pre-meditated, but I have faith in you Anons.
Be extremely cautious of people following you onto subways and buses. Get off, change buses or train cabs immediately. If possible, give a taste of their own medicine and take pictures of them.
That's about all I can think of for now, and everyone is always encouraged to discuss these things in comments. Whether you agree or disagree, no words are too dumb, (unless you are a scientologist.) Frankly, don't waste time with Paul Fetch and Ruthie, she's a fucking ugly cunt that's better off with her face severely concaved in with a fucking steel bat with pikes. None of that should be the greater issue for us right now, as they pose no current threat to us.
Perservere and we shall prevail. Let's show the church that this is no longer just the fad it started out to be, but we'll continuously fight to tear their shit apart.
Signed.
Fuck you.
As we are doing a good job thus-far in our war against the cult of pseudo-Scientology, we must be cautious of those who are currently standing against us. A wise man have once said that, in a state of battle, keep your friends and allies close but keep your enemies closer. I can not agree more. Since Anonymous is a proudly large collective entity with no leaders, it's important that we must remain focused and organized in terms of our strategic plannings and movements. We definitely don't wish for one man's mistakes to undermine, regress or completely fuck up what we've accomplished up to this point.
So today I will be discussing about just some of our oppositions that I've observed in these past few weeks - and what is scary is that some of them exists as disguises within our group. These people are no doubt either spies, undercovers or traitors that are attempting to destroy our organization from within. Here are some obvious members I have been studying on Youtube.
1. ANONYMOUSagainstAnon.
This is obviously a failed attempt from a secret Scifag, that tries to pose himself as Anonymous and use our code of dialects in order to fool us that he is a part of our body. This way, he can try to alter our route and ideas because he believes a fake "Anonymous" would be more impressionable on other anons. This is obviously nothing more than an epic fail. We can obviously see that this is a secret Scifag in disguise, and frankly, it seems to me like he has nothing more to do nowadays but to spam "BIGOTRY" all over our videos. Whenever you see this being done, simply spam him back with "HYPOCRISY" and move on.
Beware of him subscribing to your videos, he has nothing better to do on his spare time but to study our propaganda footages. He may very well be reporting everything back to his Scifag headquarter.
Although this one idiot does little to stunt our project's development itself, it demonstrates a very obvious flaw we have. Since our organization lacks a bureaucratic system, it has no security to it. Any motherfucking Scifag can easily infilitrate within, and pose as other Anons. They can try to steer us in a different direction, or they can try to corrupt us from the inside. Now I am not suggesting that we should establish bureaucracy and manually approve every member, since our anonymity is also one of our greatest strengths, but please be cautious of who you speak to, who you associate with online and trusting those who you don't know. A great philosopher have once said, TEH INTRAN3T IZ S0ME S3RI0UZ BUSYN3SZ.
I will now move on and discuss other threats.
2. defendscientology.
Unlike the first one, this one doesn't pose as an Anonymous from inside the group. Instead, he makes it very obvious that he supports Scientology by posting retarded fucking videos with the average IQ of everyone in Clearwater, Florida combined: 58. He tries to adopt to the style of other anon's video making, but however he fails at one particular thing, and that is being funny. What he also fails to realize is that being one among few vigilantes defending Scientology on Youtube, his incoherent bullshit quabble isn't going to get through to a mainstream audience. If anything, it will make his religious institution look like a bunch of fucking ass clowns. Yes, more so than they already do.
His full name is - apparently - Jacob K. Reist, so do a directory search of him in every state and see what you can come up with.
Now I will go on to discuss about something very suspicious I have received in my inbox yesterday.
3. Pause the video right now and read this message for a second.
No doubt some of you may have also received this as well. Although this may be just a genuine attempt of an outsider trying to document our ideology and agenda, it's strange that anyone would approach us in this fashion. Perhaps the group he hopes to gather up will in fact be working to disclose much-needed information for the scientology department? Why would Anonymous be spreading DVDs on the streets when the internet is proven to be the most effective medium for our spread of words? Again, this may not be as big of a deal as I am making it, but the point of this once again goes back to being careful of who you trust and who you work with. If his proposed project is to work, I am not sure how it may be organized seeing that our members are so scattered all over. This topic is open for discussion in the comment section of this page.
Now I will proceed to talk about the warnings of March 15th, 2008.
There has been and will be Scifags going undercover in masks, trying to pose as us at these raids. Be careful of who you associate and exchange information with, I cannot stress this enough. There have been people coming in and out of the Scientology headquarter in my city during the last protest and they circulate the perimeter, taking pictures of others while posing as reporters. Be careful of any "independent journalists" you speak to, be sure to ask them who they work for. Of course, a well rehearsed Scifag would have all the information pre-meditated, but I have faith in you Anons.
Be extremely cautious of people following you onto subways and buses. Get off, change buses or train cabs immediately. If possible, give a taste of their own medicine and take pictures of them.
That's about all I can think of for now, and everyone is always encouraged to discuss these things in comments. Whether you agree or disagree, no words are too dumb, (unless you are a scientologist.) Frankly, don't waste time with Paul Fetch and Ruthie, she's a fucking ugly cunt that's better off with her face severely concaved in with a fucking steel bat with pikes. None of that should be the greater issue for us right now, as they pose no current threat to us.
Perservere and we shall prevail. Let's show the church that this is no longer just the fad it started out to be, but we'll continuously fight to tear their shit apart.
Signed.
Fuck you.
4 comments:
That's all well and good that you're open for discussion of this topic. And the gesture acknowleding that my message was genuine, is just fine.
However, I find something suspect. You deleted my rebuttal where I rebuked your suspicions in your BLOG, but you still haven't changed your VIDEO. So the only thing that was really removed was me explaining myself to people that could read your blog, and there's still room there for new readers to suspect I'm a spy.
So if you say you deleted it for the purposes of carrying the suggestion out, you can't opt for the "IT'S FOR SECRECY AND SUCCESS OF THE SUGGESTION!" angle, because.. what I suggested is still up in video format, and not a secret at all now.
You selectively removed things that made you look presumptive and paranoid.
So I ask you to do one of two things: construct a new video omitting that you leapt to conclusions concerning me, or LET MY SIDE OF THE STORY stay on your blog. Or both, if you're feeling generous. Deleting my response RIGHT HERE, where your forum advertises expression and communication, was -not cool.-
Without the original message itself, what I have talked about on my video is just a vaguely obscure knowledge set of knowledge that only you and I comprehensively share. Nobody knows what we are fully talking about, and they can only derive meanings out of their own speculations from a few keywords given. I express all apologies, but calm down. I'm willing to work on this with you together.
Thank you for understanding. :)
Post a Comment